CAT and EMM stream is enough
[B]
The [COLOR="Blue"]EMM Pid[/COLOR] can be found in [COLOR="Red"]CAT table[/COLOR] with PID value [COLOR="Red"]0x0001[/COLOR] under [COLOR="Purple"]CA Descriptor[/COLOR].
While the [COLOR="Blue"]ECM PIDs[/COLOR] can be found in [COLOR="Purple"]CA Descriptor[/COLOR] under [COLOR="Red"]PMT[/COLOR].[/B]
Not sure which program you can chose which pids to record,but as a must,a PAT and PMT should be present in a TS in order to find ECM pid.Then CAT shows EMM pid.
I saw many devices and programs not following this rule,though.
JimBizkit
In raw EMM mode,I guess only binary files are accepted,not text logs,correct?
Yes, only binary files at the moment.In raw EMM mode,I guess only binary files are accepted,not text logs,correct?
You know that the detection of the conditional access descriptor is all about what's written in the program or receiver you tuned this channels with,right?
I mean,if the CA list is not correct the descrition of the CA can be wrong.
The descriptor comes in the stream,the receiver reads and match it to a list in firmware,the list could be wrong.
Director = Tandberg
GI = Digicypher 1 and 2
Nicovil
Look at the CAT,if the CA id is 0x1010,its Tandberg.
In fact ANY CA id you see between 0x1000 to 0x10FF is Tandberg.
But you do not see that.
You clearly see 0x4749,which is NOT tandberg,is GI.
GI uses the range 0x4700 to 0x47FF
Not sure what's your confusion,different security providers have assigned a different CA id,this are clearly not related.
That is clearly NOT a Director channel.
And whenever you see this posted as Director,is clearly wrong.It is possible this channel was,some time ago,using Director,and another possibility is is symulcrypt both,GI and tandberg,but not by the picture you are showing.
If the receiver is showing this channel as tandberg,is clearly the case the receiver firmware uses a CA id list that is WRONG.
Source : ETSI
_http://www.dvbservices.com/identifiers/ca_system_id?page=1