Nevermind, I've tried it
using GTX 1650, it look like this, running 3 instances
86303616+85944680+86055840 = 258304136 keys/
Is this on a laptop? what cpu , ram, ram speed , gpu driver versionexe from 11/2011, cudart64_40_17.dll, GTX1050:
128 Resulting speed: 157552112 keys/s
512 Resulting speed: 185312192 keys/s
1024 Resulting speed: 200622912 keys/s
^
might be number of blocks
If we look at the exe date of 2011, what card were around then. Just the newest were the 500 seriesexe from 11/2011, cudart64_40_17.dll, GTX1050:
128 Resulting speed: 157552112 keys/s
512 Resulting speed: 185312192 keys/s
1024 Resulting speed: 200622912 keys/s
^
might be number of blocks
I hope you understand we are not competing in a case of conspiracy theories.
But I wonder why so many of you thinks that there are users with better tools and that they do not want to share them.
24GB RAM, 3 instances run at the same time, I use the 102464 exe you've sharedPlease post all the details of your system
which 1650 is it? the super? TI? how many gigs.
Cpu and ram etc
which version did you run? 102464?
By 3 instance i mean running 3 copys at the same time, not doing 3 runs , but 860+ per copy speed looks about right,
24GB RAM, 3 instances run at the same time, I use the 102464 exe you've shared
plain GTX1650, intel core i5 11th generation
I don't think the CPU and RAM matter that much, it's the CUDA cores, which is 896 cores, which is weird since RTX 3560 has 3584 CUDA cores
Yes, but thats very low speed here is some data from old test200622912 keys/s on a 1050:
Desktop, not a laptop. But it's a single instance, maybe thats the difference?
Not really a flaw in the app , Cpu memory bandwidth helps everything running in windows.Odd. CPU has only DDR4-2133, but that shoudnt matter and shows another bad design in that app.
Actually furthur to this it was in fact a 1050 TI model not a standard 1050, but still weak numbersYes, but thats very low speed here is some data from old test
gpu tweak OC mode
gpu boostclock 1518 mhz
357 million
gpu boostclock 1600 mhz
367 million
gpu boostclock 1600 mhz
mem +504 =7512 mhz
377 million
gpu boostclock 1600 mhz
mem +700 =7708 mhz
377 million pwr vrel issues
using msi afterburner
coreclock +150mhz
370 million
CPU was running 4,18GHzIs that the 1650 Super with GDDR 6 ram?
A very interesting result when you compare the cores to the 3060ti As it has much less cores but a slightly higher boost clock along with less ram and memory bandwidth.
What speed ram does your CPU have? and yes test have shown cudabiss performance likes faster memory such as 3200 mhz ddr 4 or better
Please try running a test with 4 or even 5 copys running. To see if you can max out any more performance
working for meHow s7up1d of me. Sorry
My password will always be, present and pass files. Easy no. I put password as in my experience files last longer on web. I suspect as they are lock no one complains. But the password is generic always the same.
Code:www.sat-universe.com
I also have this, it's not multithreaded (one core usage only), compiled only in 32-bit binaryI found the linux version of cwfinder on my HD
also from the read me
Forum: http://mower.orgfree.com/forum
Webpage: http://mower.orgfree.com
which you can still view in waybackmachine