How find BISS keys over CWFinder09 of help CW_list_Attack ...
- Thread starter jan55
- Start date
I am not sure that this tool works properly also.
What I do - I don't know about any other keys, but I made this:
I make sure that there is no CW in the list. For example the snooker.
Maybe I don't do something right ?
I make the ts file, I load it the list, then I load the cw file, then I click proc program, well it doesn't find anything??
What I do - I don't know about any other keys, but I made this:
I make sure that there is no CW in the list. For example the snooker.
I check it with the finder - there isn't. Then I add it in the list manually. Cw finds it, but this tool doesn't - despite the fact that I can find it with with cw fider.
Maybe I don't do something right ?
I make the ts file, I load it the list, then I load the cw file, then I click proc program, well it doesn't find anything??
Last edited:
real-madrid
Registered
- Messages
- 35
already CSA can scan 5 tb 1.5 min. There is no difficult situation.
Hit "Enter" after you added last key in text editor (or "\r\n" in code). That list format described on mower's page.
Martin.Wigston
Registered
- Messages
- 973
Did you do a carriage return after entering the key (without check digits) so there is a blank line at the end of the file.
I used the snooker feed to test it too, both with the key at the start then the end. I didnt leave a blank line at the end and it didnt find it but with a blank line at the end it did, in a fraction of a second.
I used the snooker feed to test it too, both with the key at the start then the end. I didnt leave a blank line at the end and it didnt find it but with a blank line at the end it did, in a fraction of a second.
Last edited:
Martin.Wigston
Registered
- Messages
- 973
No it dosent, it uses a binary search, not a serial search, so only samples a smaller part of the table.
bloody found it
lightning fast....Jesus you should really try to make a list from 00000000 to FFFFFFFFF and try to see how fast this really is.... I really mean it!
Last edited:
bloody found it
Jesus you should really try to make a list from 00000000 to FFFFFFFFF and try to see how fast this really is.... I really mean it!
Even creating that list would take an extraordinary long amount of time.
BRO iTS MUCH FASTER :thum: LOADING more than 5 millionCW at 1-2 sec
[url=https://pixhost.org/show/5/54254314_ada.png][/URL][url=https://pixhost.org/show/5/54254324_2.png]
[/URL]
THANK YOU FOR GOOD JOB :thum:
That true, it is really much more faster than CW FINDER 1.0! Thanks to the coder!:thum:
Great fast program! Thanks.
I have huge CW list file but it is impossible to load it - this program consumes much more memory (~5.5GB for 10GB file)
So creating one file for 0x0-FxF does not have any sense, but does if we split file to several smaller
I have splitted 10GB file to 16 files and it loads it fast and search very fast
I have huge CW list file but it is impossible to load it - this program consumes much more memory (~5.5GB for 10GB file)
So creating one file for 0x0-FxF does not have any sense, but does if we split file to several smaller
I have splitted 10GB file to 16 files and it loads it fast and search very fast
How did you record your TS?whats wrong ?
