Encryption Projects as SU group

S

Sunrise999

Registered
Messages
48
I did try with am 5 7950x 6000 ram and was very slow 3070 ti with win 11.
Since have moved to Dev. now 4 builds later did not test again Ms knows 11 win you would
need to close other app's. 100% win 11 is a beta they test for there next change.
 
M

moonbase

VIP
Donating Member
Messages
550
sdrfgs said:
Well this thread has died again ,iis their nothing to report?
Click to expand...

I have stopped reporting results until I see more results shared from other downloaders of the latest vesions.
Apart from you and @spot there have been no results shared by anyone else this year since @Lak7 started releasing recent versions of CudaBISS.
 
S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
99
Sunrise999 said:
I did try with am 5 7950x 6000 ram and was very slow 3070 ti with win 11.
Since have moved to Dev. now 4 builds later did not test again Ms knows 11 win you would
need to close other app's. 100% win 11 is a beta they test for there next change.
Click to expand...
Please try it again and report the results
 
S

Sunrise999

Registered
Messages
48
I lost the 3070 file maybe LaK7 would reupload has been removed at mediafire Thank's
Also what input numbers would you like me to use then were on the same page.
Will be busy this weekend will be later with results.
 
S

Sunrise999

Registered
Messages
48
Thank you for the upload did start with 51264 while waiting .
May be 5 years ago since I tried with a 1080 with win 10 and was 24 hours.
 
M

moonbase

VIP
Donating Member
Messages
550
Lak7 said:
I agree. I'm sure not many people using it.
Click to expand...


If you can check how many individual downloads there have been for the file versions it would give you an idea of possible user numbers?
There have been promises to share results from users but they never came back with results.

For anyone wishing to share and compare, the fastest recorded speed so far reported in this topic is 16.289 billion keys per second.
This can probably be improved upon but I will not be publishing test results if I manage to improve on it.
At this speed a full biss range takes 4 hours and 48 minutes to run.

There will obviously be quite a large jump in test speeds with CudaBISS when the next generation of NVIDIA cards are released.


RX4090.jpg
 
L

Lak7

Registered
Messages
35
moonbase said:
If you can check how many individual downloads there have been for the file versions it would give you an idea of possible user numbers?
Click to expand...
I only left the link active for a couple of days. Usually around 15 downloads.
 
S

Sunrise999

Registered
Messages
48
My test did not go good to have a base number i used 44864 . Watching there are times it slows down and can read byte 8.
Takes 3 hours to run 3 or b and the end number was 1655196416 at this point i take a break.
Would be nice if someone that is testing with win 11 would comment .
 
S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
99
Theres no need to test for hours. A short test of a limited range is fine.
a 1080 card should do around 800-950 million keys (single copy), depending on other factors mentioned throught the thread. Using the original 51264 release
 
S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
99
sdrfgs said:
Theres no need to test for hours. A short test of a limited range is fine.
a 1080 card should do around 800-950 million keys (single copy), depending on other factors mentioned throught the thread. Using the original 51264 release
Click to expand...
Sorry I misunderstood your post, if you are using a 3070TI , see back in the thread my tests with a 3060ti your results should be higher than mine..a 3060ti at stock using the original 51264.exe use to give around 1100 million for a single copy. It could be pushed into maximized performance with 2 copys at 730+ million each
 
Last edited:
S

Sunrise999

Registered
Messages
48
My test is as follow 1st. 51264 3 hours 10 minutes
second test 3 hours 15 minutes setting card to performance
third test with 44864 2 hours 55 minutes card set to performance
This is from 30 to 40 etc. Cpu set by Ryzen program run at 5.3 to 5.5 all cores.
Too bad we couldn't be looking for the biss key should speed the process .
 
M

moonbase

VIP
Donating Member
Messages
550
Sunrise999 said:
My test is as follow 1st. 51264 3 hours 10 minutes
second test 3 hours 15 minutes setting card to performance
third test with 44864 2 hours 55 minutes card set to performance
This is from 30 to 40 etc. Cpu set by Ryzen program run at 5.3 to 5.5 all cores.
Too bad we couldn't be looking for the biss key should speed the process .
Click to expand...


Thank you for sharing your test results.

Did you try running multiple instances at the same time?
One instance is not very efficient, two or more instances give a boost to speed when combined.

If you split your 300000 to 3FFFFF range into two sections such as 300000 to 37FFFF and 380000 to 3FFFFF the combined speed should be quite a bit faster than a single instance.
 
S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
99
sunrise999 why are you using 51264.exe? thats the older slower one and the 44864 version is obsolete also

see if you can compare with my previous test, use the same input data

using version 30xx up

machine used
I7 7700 3.6GHZ overclock -> 4.1GHZ
Win 10 10.0.019045
16 GB
3060 TI 8GB

input file

000000000000
010000000000
47420097FBD6514CF8A45710DEDC2BA8
47420090ACA55EC7AD6798DA9939A615
4742009C34C7B45CBFF0718AEDBE387B
1

connected remotely via vnc (please note this gives lower speed due to some gpu usage in streaming the desktop display)

scrolling version used

1 copy 3029.112320 keys/s
cpu usage 13.8% - 14.8% taskmanager process

2 copys
copy 1 2034.757504 keys/s
copy 2 2034.998400 keys/s
cpu usage 14.5% - 15.% each taskmanager process
4069.755904 combined

3 copys
copy 1 1359579392 keys/s
copy 2 1363957888 keys/s
copy 3 1348746752 keys/s
cpu usage 13.5% - 15.% each taskmanager process, 95.9MB per copy
4072.284032 combined

overall about a %10 speed increase over the previous "64" version
 
S

Sunrise999

Registered
Messages
48
Had some trouble starting 12 - 3 - VS22 removed last key found and last key files.
Starting at all 000000000000 - 100000000000 was 1 Hour 10 Minutes with 1 instance.
Ms sent a couple of system updates is why I took my time they log this build all the time.
At this point I retire from the project until a later time.
 
S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
99
range i used was
000000000000
010000000000

take nowhere near 1 hour ,just 12 minutes or so if i remember correctly
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top