CWL File Project with tsdec

G

gotya

Moderator
Messages
7,200
BeatrixKiddo said:
Impossible don't find cw with cudabiss+cwfinder+csav1+csav2!!!
Click to expand...

yes possible.... and if you are not interested let the others do the work and stop spamming :mad:

last Friday you didn't even know how to put the biss key in the VLC media player to play the recorded ts file once the biss key is found :confused:
BeatrixKiddo said:
How can do it with VLC?
Thanx!
Click to expand...

and I did show you how
www.sat-universe.com/showpost.php?p=2036775737&postcount=37

anyway I think you didn't get my point yet

I know a group are working long time ago and collecting all the biss keys and building their own lists and never share these lists with anyone except their groups and I don't have it.

here's an example of the tools you complain
cudabiss => How are sure of the mode you search if the CW unkown.
cwfinder => there are lots of attack list updated and only if the CW was accidentally added in one of the lists.
csav1 => the plain tables are different from user to another
csav2 => the success rate is NOT 100%

so my point is
sometimes one of the biss keys were found long time ago by csav1 only and there is a possibility that this biss key were found with a plain table that was only added with that user only and he didn't share his *.rbc chain file because many they built their own chains before because the internet speed were slow and didn't able to upload or download the chain files.

and to make things easier this work needs a group, like before they used to build up their own chains then upload them and share them, now only work in groups to collect the old biss keys and share them together.

BeatrixKiddo said:
I repeat, this software is fine for only those who want to record a feed immediately without wasting time, and then see it later when cw found.....
Click to expand...

I already mentioned that here :clapping:
gotya said:
the *.cwl project is mostly used when there is an event but the biss key is not found so we record the event incase later we found the biss key then we add it in the .cwl list to decrypt the recorded ts file
Click to expand...

my advise about the *.cwl list is not to create a new where instead to collect all the old biss keys from our threads in groups, where each group takes their own threads and start collecting the biss keys :thum:

also if there is any programmer here who could helps by making his own *.cwl project and start building his own list and share it with us here to have more possibility of finding the biss keys.

be noted that the 4th & 8th bytes of the biss keys are a checksum in the *.cwl list.

finally
the work of collecting the old biss keys needs a group of members the more members the bigger *.cwl file and the faster

so with that *.cwl there will be a chance for each one who has not CSA-Rainbow-Table-Tool V1 & V2 a possibility to find a biss key

if anyone needs a help I will follow up

good luck..... :thum:
 
D

dale_para_bajo

Registered
Messages
646
You are ALL correct, including me. As we speak each on our own small porpoise.

Now what I do not agree is the so called creation of a FULL List fro 0 to FFFF... That my friends is some how out of reach.

Just take CSA RBT V2 for example. Colibri created that RBT in the hope to be as Full as Possible. Still the size is over 2 terabytes. And each code represent the look up of about 0x1000 or 4096. So to have it all using just not totally correct calculation we can assume 4096*2 Terabyte or over 8000 terabytes. I know it is wrong but it gives the Idea. Now How long will it take to read that list to ensure you get the code?? Id your Memory on your PC setup to handle that amount of data? Is Modysat designed to handle such a big file.

And many more questions.
 
B

BeatrixKiddo

Registered
Messages
218
Gotya we did not understand very well. Ever since I discovered tsdec I use it every day, I'm a person who often rec the feeds to see them later and for that I love this software!! But I find it useless and waste time creating this big cwl file. My definite idea is to use the cloud to create a huge rbt leaning on a very large computer and do the search for cw directly online and in just a few minutes to have a valid cw. Use the power of all of our PCs in a centralized manner and not using them all on their own. This would be an interesting project that would be above all others......
ok...btw....have a good work!!! :):)
 
G

gotya

Moderator
Messages
7,200
abed1988 said:
hello guys i convert CW_list_Attack for cwfinder it do by shishmish
to cwl file

i convert CW_list_Attack_2017_20.04.17
this is file
ther is 5068116 keys

https://www.sendspace.com/file/bq41yf

but it take all lotf time
i see is cwfinder best thene tsdec
Click to expand...

What's the point of converting ?

the testing keys in the CW_list_Attack_2017_20.04.17 is known already and made for CWFinder tool

anyway after checking the file

it's all wrong :(

the even and odd keys don't have the same keys
also the 4th & 8th bytes are not correct because the are a checksum
most of the lines are garbage and having more than 8 bytes :confused:

we don't need an old published testing keys list

I said many times why don't try with all the old published BISS Keys from the Biss Feed Keys threads and Biss threads

they are all 100% correct biss keys and many events did use their old previous keys

good luck....
 
A

abed1988

VIP
Messages
5,431
gotya said:
What's the point of converting ?

the testing keys in the CW_list_Attack_2017_20.04.17 is known already and made for CWFinder tool

anyway after checking the file

it's all wrong :(

the even and odd keys don't have the same keys
also the 4th & 8th bytes are not correct because the are a checksum
most of the lines are garbage and having more than 8 bytes :confused:

we don't need an old published testing keys list

I said many times why don't try with all the old published BISS Keys from the Biss Feed Keys threads and Biss threads

they are all 100% correct biss keys and many events did use their old previous keys

good luck....
Click to expand...

yes i know this
but i test
this key C9 4F 77 8F 89 5B E6 CA ok


like this C9 4F 77 28F 89 5B E6 1CA


you can test anther keys :thum:
 
G

gotya

Moderator
Messages
7,200
if you guys want to make a new *.cwl list and it's hard for you to get the calculation of the 4th checksum from the 1st,2nd and 3rd bytes and the 8th checksum from the 5th,6th and 7th bytes JUST LEAVE THE 4th & 8th bytes with 00 because most of the decoders ignore them ;)
e.g: 1111110011111100
the correct calculation checksum for 4th & 8th bytes are 1111113311111133

good luck....
 
A

abed1988

VIP
Messages
5,431
gotya said:
if you guys want to make a new *.cwl list and it's hard for you to get the calculation of the 4th checksum from the 1st,2nd and 3rd bytes and the 8th checksum from the 5th,6th and 7th bytes JUST LEAVE THE 4th & 8th bytes with 00 because most of the decoders ignore them ;)
e.g: 1111110011111100
the correct calculation checksum for 4th & 8th bytes are 1111113311111133

good luck....
Click to expand...

i convert file with Ms excel and i calculat the 4th checksum from the 1st,2nd and 3rd bytes and the 8th checksum from the 5th,6th and 7th bytes

ok and it is good :thum:
 
S

srijan20

Registered
Messages
104
gotya said:
if you guys want to make a new *.cwl list and it's hard for you to get the calculation of the 4th checksum from the 1st,2nd and 3rd bytes and the 8th checksum from the 5th,6th and 7th bytes JUST LEAVE THE 4th & 8th bytes with 00 because most of the decoders ignore them ;)
e.g: 1111110011111100
the correct calculation checksum for 4th & 8th bytes are 1111113311111133

good luck....
Click to expand...

Yes, don't need to Calculate 4th & 8th Checksum Bytes. Just leave them empty (00) because TSDEC will Correct the Checksum Errors & it also save time to make CWL. :thum:
 
S

srijan20

Registered
Messages
104
Sorry. My Focus Has Been Changed for These Days. But I Stay to This Thread.

Pls, Gotya Can You Send Me Link of Tennis Feeds?
 
D

dale_para_bajo

Registered
Messages
646
Since this thread was revived I will do my Sunday paranoia discussion.

Do you guys do not think we are manipulated? Look at this thread. srijan20 just signed in this Forum around february this year. 105 Post in only 3 month. And disappear.

Now what was he trying to accomplish? Yes a 1 data base full of CWs. Waoo. And the so call CSA Roll appeared? Strange.

Now we did gave him how to quickly detect if a CW is good or false for a particular TS? And I guess it show in the new receivers.

Listen I did like srijan20 that is why I help him. I am not trying to accused him or blame him for anything. It is just strange + my paranoia. Anyone that had read this tread could had gotten the Idea f making CSA to Roll. Make your own conclusions.
 
Last edited:
E

Erdal5555

Registered
Messages
5
V0.4.1 26.12.10 gcc support (without performance measure and priority setting)

V0.4.0 25.10.09 added gui and small bugfixes

V0.3.1 28.06.09 faster recync with repeated parity + mingw32 make

V0.3.0 21.03.09 resyncing + faster sync if TS starts before CWL

V0.2.8 22.02.09 bugfix: crash when decrytion is done in zero time
bugfix: crash when CWL is shorter than TS

V0.2.7 05.02.09 adaptation field is considered for PES header check

V0.2.6 20.01.09 time measure

V0.2.5 16.01.09 no dynamic libraries

V0.2.4 11.01.09 CW checksum calculation

V0.2.3 19.12.08 parity change blocking + return codes + clean ups

V0.2.2 12.12.08 constant cw encryption/decryption

V0.2.1 11.12.08 CSA from libdvbcsa project

V0.1 09.12.08 initial revision based on cwldec 0.0.2
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top