CCcam and antishare viaccess feature

[lemrid]

hi,

looks like antishare system will be activated soon ( WC ) especially on Viaccess platforms.

the antishare system is based on the statement that each card wont decrypt more than 3 channels at the same time. my questions are :

1 - Dynamic caching feature : does CCcam store ECMs and CWs inside indexed tables ???

or does it forward each ECM to the card ???? if so, wont it be better to add it in order to bypass the antishare ???

2 - loadbalancing : does CCcam switch from à card to another depending on PINGs or availablity ( card cant handle more than 3 requests ).

3 - cant it add sids to provids for availables shares so the ECM request becomes more direct ????

4- wont it be faster if UDP is used instead of TCP connexions ????

btw newcs cardserver ( when cham is activated ) can do such things Augenzwinkern

thkx

 

[lemrid]

so no one ????

 

[ovidiumarius]

hi,

looks like antishare system will be activated soon ( WC ) especially on Viaccess platforms.

the antishare system is based on the statement that each card wont decrypt more than 3 channels at the same time. my questions are :

1 - Dynamic caching feature : does CCcam store ECMs and CWs inside indexed tables ???

or does it forward each ECM to the card ???? if so, wont it be better to add it in order to bypass the antishare ???

2 - loadbalancing : does CCcam switch from à card to another depending on PINGs or availablity ( card cant handle more than 3 requests ).

3 - cant it add sids to provids for availables shares so the ECM request becomes more direct ????

4- wont it be faster if UDP is used instead of TCP connexions ????

btw newcs cardserver ( when cham is activated ) can do such things Augenzwinkern

thkx

So we must use oscam, this emu have solution for "Dynamic caching feature" and "loadbalancing".
Yes it could be faster if UDP protocol are used ... like old gbox or new mbox but without future ...