hello need your advice pls. i am one of those who are on the waiting list and while talking with others they highlighted some points for me that i need your opinion and advice about when compared to the dm8000.
1- vu can't and will not be able to do pip as the dm8000 for example.
2- vu is not a replacement for the dm8000 as for the build quality and functionality.
3- i feel like the dm8000 is outdated, being produced on late 2008 and no updated hardware yet (may b i am wrong but according to my search) where as the vu is being updated 1.2, 1.3 and now the 2.2. despite the fact that no one knows what is updated/modified.
if and just if, will you advice to get a dm8000 if affordable or will still get the vu.
thanks for your advice
1. That is what is writen around the net in reality we need to see. But note that VU+duo can record 6 HD chanels simultaneously and dm8000 can't.
2. VU+duo has excelent build quality, they did not spare any expense in quality parts, after all its made in korea not china.
3. I think beside deep sleep recording, there are only manufacturing changes as the demand for this box is extremely high.
I will definetely get VU+duo over dm8000 here is why:
+VU+ has 50% more ram.
+Has newer and faster cpu.
+Has sylicone tuners which are integrated with this cpu.
+Has e-sata.
+It works faster than DM8000
+It's more than half the price of dm8000
========
-on the other side DM8000 has slots for extra terrestrial tuner (but its matter of days when VU+ gets support for usb DTT) and I personaly don't needed bcs all my TVs at home have built DTT.
-also has 4 cam slots while VU has 2 (but who needs more than two cams in emu world)
-has CF reader which noone uses and has digital coaxial audio jack suitable for older amplifiers.