My new Biss Server plans

B

BLACKCRUSADER

Senior Member
Messages
1,991
campag5242 said:
@blackcrusader, these crypt8 will work your system for a little longer than those selectively chosen (favourable times) you like to post:

28 5D D1 C0 53 A7 AD B1.
Click to expand...
found in V2 lol

28 5D D1 C0 53 A7 AD B1 #CW: D6 XX XX XX XX XX XX D6

Search CW Start
RBT file: D:\Biss V1 file\B8hxFFh\B8hxFFh_table2\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 213851 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 93 sec.)
 
Last edited:
C

cayoenrique

Member
Messages
475
@BLACKCRUSADER

I sense in your last two post some stress.
Please do not take our post as if there is some disbelieve or pressure. That is not the Idea.

I love this thread of yours, as I hope to learn what you best card do. My post meant only to show where I am at with old equipment and a couple of usb flash.

Now as campag5242 said I confuse some of his post with yours. The Title of this thread is "My new Biss Server plans". From it I conclude you have a good system now. And have plans to purchase an even better. But I am interested in what you have now. Can you tell us what is your system now. Thanks.
 
B

BLACKCRUSADER

Senior Member
Messages
1,991
I am very busy right now as I own 2 businesses and they both require my input. So no there is not stress just not enough time.

Next week when things are slower I can spend more time playing on my server. :D

Yes I already have a good system now using Samsung EVO 4TB SSD drive with 3.6tb data for V1 My GPU is an Asus Nvidia TGX 1080 TIvI7 7800x 3.5Ghz 8gb ram Windows 7 Pro.

It's been discussed in other threads when people claimed several years ago I was nuts to spend so much money building such a system.



sattechtips sattechtips is offline

@BLACKCRUSADER

In every your post you advertising how you have 4 TB SSD and 1080Ti and how "big" is your PC.
Keep this info for yourself.


https://www.sat-universe.com/showthread.php?t=294902&page=88

Merging my V1 tables below

https://www.sat-universe.com/showthread.php?t=294902&page=61


Getting my new GTX 1080 TI in 2017

BISS SERVER V1 I7 6700 CPU / 24 GB RAM / WIN 7 PRO 64 BIT
GTX 1080 TI NVIDIA 3,584 CUDA cores 4TB Samsung SSD 318GB RBT V1 table

https://www.sat-universe.com/showthread.php?p=2037156215#post2037156215
 
Last edited:
C

cayoenrique

Member
Messages
475
I see the picture now, busy guy (own 2 businesses), and it seems you got some friction on some post when you try to post your GPU reality vs CWFinder09.

Listen there is never a good reason to go on public shooting as they do in the USA. I personally have a few trolls in this forum over me in the past. So I did stop posting in the forum for quite some time. That is the reason I did not saw all those post you did just pointed to me for read. Yes I was away.

Now going back to thread objective.

There are many GPU characteristic that influence final output rate. The main is compute power of its cores.

Compute power = Number of stream processors(cores) X Speed at they work

HD7950 => 1792 cores @ 800 Mgz = 1792 x 800 = 1433600
GTX 1080 TI => 3584 cores @ 1481 Mgz = 3584 x 1481 = 5307904

So your GTX 1080 TI is about
5307904 / 1433600 = 3.7 faster than mine.

Sure there is a lot more to be looking. But that is the basic start point. This is what I was looking on my request to you. Thanks for the info. I will be waiting the results of your new equipment when it arrived.
 
B

BLACKCRUSADER

Senior Member
Messages
1,991
I believe that not only the GPU affects things. I do not run any other programs on my win 7 pro not even antivirus software.

Some people use one PC for everything so they have many other services running at the same time and some of those services need to use the GPU.

Yeah seems some people I need to pity as they get triggered I want to spend some pocket money building a nice server for biss. One person full understood though...

Imagine the RTX 3090 with over 10,000 core and two 4tb M2 SSD chips with V1 on RAID so they can do brute force. It would save days and perhaps could get a CW from brute force in an acceptable time. If not then I got myself a nice gaming computer lol

NVIDIA CUDA Cores 10496
Boost Clock 1.70 GHz
Memory Size 24 GB

Or the Nvidia 3080 TI

Pipelines / CUDA cores 10240 of 10752 (GA102)
Boost clock 1665 MHz

Both cards with 17 million


I love it when people reply they would not spend the money on this new system. Well I am not asking them to spend any money I am not asking for crowd funding.
 
Last edited:
C

campag5242

Feed Hunter
Messages
2,585
BLACKCRUSADER said:
found in V2 lol

28 5D D1 C0 53 A7 AD B1 #CW: D6 XX XX XX XX XX XX D6

Search CW Start
RBT file: D:\Biss V1 file\B8hxFFh\B8hxFFh_table2\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 213851 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 93 sec.)
Click to expand...

You don't go on to show the time taken to complete the (failed) search of the v1 table (another 30 seconds or so)? That 0 to 30 seconds (stopping as soon as the CW is found) is the part your GPU upgrade will boost.

At 0 secs the GPU is searching link 0000, and (if the key is not found) after another 30secs link FFFFh. Most results are found nearer link 0000 than FFFF, so typically that part ends quickly: the average for all searches is not half of 30, but more like 1/3rd of that, or 10 seconds in your case. I fear you may be disappointed with any gains on the GPU side.

Disk is another matter. I cannot recall whether the "hardisk only search time" includes time for end67 calcs also, but if these modern SSD are vastly superior, then you will benefit way more from the SSD upgrade.
 
B

BLACKCRUSADER

Senior Member
Messages
1,991
campag5242 said:
You don't go on to show the time taken to complete the (failed) search of the v1 table (another 30 seconds or so)? That 0 to 30 seconds (stopping as soon as the CW is found) is the part your GPU upgrade will boost.

At 0 secs the GPU is searching link 0000, and (if the key is not found) after another 30secs link FFFFh. Most results are found nearer link 0000 than FFFF, so typically that part ends quickly: the average for all searches is not half of 30, but more like 1/3rd of that, or 10 seconds in your case. I fear you may be disappointed with any gains on the GPU side.

Disk is another matter. I cannot recall whether the "hardisk only search time" includes time for end67 calcs also, but if these modern SSD are vastly superior, then you will benefit way more from the SSD upgrade.
Click to expand...


My V1 also found the CW for that as did my V2, I will run it again and post a screen shot. Just too busy atm. you should not assume my V1 did not find it. ASSumptions are bad. Of course I could be bordering on the insane. My life is an absurdity without doubt.

Did I say my V1 search failed to find the CW? No GPU search was another 105 seconds if I recall correctly.

You have made claims about my current system and were wrong on all of them so far. How would a Sabrent 4TB M2 SSD drive with a max speed of 7200mb/s be not be far superior to the max 550mb/s the current Samsung EVO 4TB SSD drive has?
 
Last edited:
C

campag5242

Feed Hunter
Messages
2,585
Well yes, if you have built & merged many more chains into the public tables, there is a chance that your system might find it. That's why I posted several of these rare cases, and the not-in-public-v1-tables pair. I was simply trying to get you to expose that other important benchmark: longest time taken for search (key at link FFFFh, or failed search, both about the same time).

An extra 105s after the disk search seems excessive for a 1080ti.

As has been mentioned already, disk performance on RBT look ups is not about sustained transfer speed, but about random reads. But yes, it would be odd that a disk didn't offer improvements in both.
 
Last edited:
B

BLACKCRUSADER

Senior Member
Messages
1,991
Well on average my current system from scanning a TS stream to get a crypt and then get the CW using V1 has taken from a total of 170 - 200 seconds and I am happy with that. Sometimes a little faster.
 
B

BLACKCRUSADER

Senior Member
Messages
1,991
campag5242 said:
For even faster speeds, you should pick up a book on programming in C, then cuda. No amount of $ spent on hardware will match the gains spent on smarter software in this application. This is old software you are using: Colibri hasn't updated it since 2014, that's seven years!

Here's how my PC (i7-6700 / 8GB / GTX1070TI / SATA3 SSD) fares with Colibri V1.23, on a v1 08h search, crypt8 E7 D8 AB 61 9C 4A B9 E6, table 08hx000300h: Said useless 08hx000300h table resides on a slower SSD here. But same PC, different software, 3 years of learning applied:


There are HUGE gains to be made over the public tools which don't involve ridiculous hardware upgrades eg time to identify the crypt8: "ermm... this seems like a high count, maybe try a search?" vs "100% nailed on, tagged ASAP in cyphertext, automatic RBT search"... done.
Click to expand...

It's great you have the knowledge on programming not all of us other mere mortals can do so. So you waited for this thread to let us all know there are other ways to get faster results? My current system should surely be enough for this.
 
dvlajkovic

dvlajkovic

Member
Messages
498
Those android crappy boxes are just communicating via Net with PC somwhere that does the real search (or crawling the sites and collecting other peoples cw's) and sends the found cw back.

I ran the search of @campag5242 C8's on my PC and here are the results:

***************************
GTX 1080 Ti + SSD SATA3 ADATA SU800

Crypt8: FB 78 43 9A 0A 91 D3 86

Version 1.19f (Aug, 12th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 11.10 - Runtime Version: 5.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)

Search CW Start
RBT file: N:\RBT B8hxFFh\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 247279 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 134 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: E8 xx xx xx xx xx xx A8
Search CW done (173 sec.)

***************************

GTX 1080 Ti + SSD SATA3 ADATA SU800

Crypt8: 38 B2 6E 93 84 6F 9D 9C

Version 1.19f (Aug, 12th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 11.10 - Runtime Version: 5.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)

Search CW Start
RBT file: N:\RBT B8hxFFh\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 249797 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 133 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: DD xx xx xx xx xx xx AA
Search CW done (151 sec.)

***************************

GTX 1080 Ti + SSD PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe Gen4 Aorus Gigabyte

Crypt8: FB 78 43 9A 0A 91 D3 86

Version 1.19f (Aug, 12th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 11.10 - Runtime Version: 5.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)

Search CW Start
RBT file: C:\RBT B8hxFFh\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 247279 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 88 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: E8 xx xx xx xx xx xx A8
Search CW done (128 sec.)

***************************

GTX 1080 Ti + SSD PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe Gen4 Aorus Gigabyte

Crypt8: 38 B2 6E 93 84 6F 9D 9C

Version 1.19f (Aug, 12th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 11.10 - Runtime Version: 5.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)

Search CW Start
RBT file: C:\RBT B8hxFFh\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 249797 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 86 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: DD xx xx xx xx xx xx AA
Search CW done (103 sec.)

***************************

It's the same RBT, but on two SSD drives for the test purpose to see the difference.
The red SSD is SATA 3, and the blue SSD is PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe Gen4.
OS is Win 10 Pro 64-bit.
16 cores CPU is a high end as well as motherboard and RAM, but that's less important for this test.
 
S

SatEze

Donating Member
Messages
277
dvlajkovic said:
Those android crappy boxes are just communicating via Net with PC somwhere that does the real search (or crawling the sites and collecting other peoples cw's) and sends the found cw back.

I ran the search of @campag5242 C8's on my PC and here are the results:

***************************
GTX 1080 Ti + SSD SATA3 ADATA SU800

Crypt8: FB 78 43 9A 0A 91 D3 86

Version 1.19f (Aug, 12th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 11.10 - Runtime Version: 5.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)

Search CW Start
RBT file: N:\RBT B8hxFFh\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 247279 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 134 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: E8 xx xx xx xx xx xx A8
Search CW done (173 sec.)

***************************

GTX 1080 Ti + SSD SATA3 ADATA SU800

Crypt8: 38 B2 6E 93 84 6F 9D 9C

Version 1.19f (Aug, 12th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 11.10 - Runtime Version: 5.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)

Search CW Start
RBT file: N:\RBT B8hxFFh\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 249797 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 133 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: DD xx xx xx xx xx xx AA
Search CW done (151 sec.)

***************************

GTX 1080 Ti + SSD PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe Gen4 Aorus Gigabyte

Crypt8: FB 78 43 9A 0A 91 D3 86

Version 1.19f (Aug, 12th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 11.10 - Runtime Version: 5.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)

Search CW Start
RBT file: C:\RBT B8hxFFh\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 247279 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 88 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: E8 xx xx xx xx xx xx A8
Search CW done (128 sec.)

***************************

GTX 1080 Ti + SSD PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe Gen4 Aorus Gigabyte

Crypt8: 38 B2 6E 93 84 6F 9D 9C

Version 1.19f (Aug, 12th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 11.10 - Runtime Version: 5.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)

Search CW Start
RBT file: C:\RBT B8hxFFh\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 249797 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 86 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: DD xx xx xx xx xx xx AA
Search CW done (103 sec.)

***************************

It's the same RBT, but on two SSD drives for the test purpose to see the difference.
The red SSD is SATA 3, and the blue SSD is PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe Gen4.
OS is Win 10 Pro 64-bit.
16 cores CPU is a high end as well as motherboard and RAM, but that's less important for this test.
Click to expand...
Is there a way to have the tool correctly identify the total Number of CUDA cores 3584, for example, (Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)) being used or does it have a set limit as to why it displays a (-28 Cores)?
 
Last edited:
S

SatEze

Donating Member
Messages
277
dvlajkovic said:
Those android crappy boxes are just communicating via Net with PC somwhere that does the real search (or crawling the sites and collecting other peoples cw's) and sends the found cw back.

I ran the search of @campag5242 C8's on my PC and here are the results:

***************************
GTX 1080 Ti + SSD SATA3 ADATA SU800

Crypt8: FB 78 43 9A 0A 91 D3 86

Version 1.19f (Aug, 12th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 11.10 - Runtime Version: 5.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)

Search CW Start
RBT file: N:\RBT B8hxFFh\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 247279 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 134 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: E8 xx xx xx xx xx xx A8
Search CW done (173 sec.)

***************************

GTX 1080 Ti + SSD SATA3 ADATA SU800

Crypt8: 38 B2 6E 93 84 6F 9D 9C

Version 1.19f (Aug, 12th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 11.10 - Runtime Version: 5.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)

Search CW Start
RBT file: N:\RBT B8hxFFh\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 249797 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 133 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: DD xx xx xx xx xx xx AA
Search CW done (151 sec.)

***************************

GTX 1080 Ti + SSD PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe Gen4 Aorus Gigabyte

Crypt8: FB 78 43 9A 0A 91 D3 86

Version 1.19f (Aug, 12th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 11.10 - Runtime Version: 5.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)

Search CW Start
RBT file: C:\RBT B8hxFFh\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 247279 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 88 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: E8 xx xx xx xx xx xx A8
Search CW done (128 sec.)

***************************

GTX 1080 Ti + SSD PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe Gen4 Aorus Gigabyte

Crypt8: 38 B2 6E 93 84 6F 9D 9C

Version 1.19f (Aug, 12th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 11.10 - Runtime Version: 5.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (-28 Cores)

Search CW Start
RBT file: C:\RBT B8hxFFh\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 249797 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 86 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: DD xx xx xx xx xx xx AA
Search CW done (103 sec.)

***************************

It's the same RBT, but on two SSD drives for the test purpose to see the difference.
The red SSD is SATA 3, and the blue SSD is PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe Gen4.
OS is Win 10 Pro 64-bit.
16 cores CPU is a high end as well as motherboard and RAM, but that's less important for this test.
Click to expand...
Dvlajkovic & BLACKCRUSADER, I have a 1TB WD_BLACK M.2 SN770 Gen4 NVMe SSD installed on Gigabyte X570S AORUS X570 ELITE AX motherboard. When I have the RBT table and "CSA-Rainbow Table tool" on the WD 1TB NVMe SSD, it never goes past "Searching CW in RBT ..." and it stayed there for 3hrs before I stopped it with Task Manager. On the other hand, when I have the "CSA-Rainbow Table tool" on the WD 1TB NVMe SSD and the RBT table on the SSD SATA Drive, it finds the keys in record time. I see you successfully used an M.2 NVMe SSD in your test above. Any pointers as to why NVMe SSD isn't working in the format, I described above?
 
Last edited:
dvlajkovic

dvlajkovic

Member
Messages
498
Well, that could be a mixed bag of everything...
Check drivers of your M.2 SSD if the OS on your PC is using the latest available.
The same goes for your nvidia VGA - have the latest available drivers installed.
Make sure you've set CSA-Rainbow-Table-Tool to point to a proper folder where the RBT file is on SSD and to select a correct Plain type (I know this throws a different error, but just wanted to point out).

And the last thing I can think of: use CSA-Rainbow-Table-Tool (V1.19f) as the (V1.23) is prone to have the searching CW in RBT last much longer than it ever should.
 
C

cayoenrique

Member
Messages
475
@dvlajkovic & @SatEze

A quick look at Specs show nothing.

My best suggestion from one that NEVER had Cuda GPU.
See for RBT brutforce you Ignore SSL Cache or Sequential Read/Write as you will normally do for an SSD.

Instead Random Read measure in IOPS is the important.

Lets lool at
Code: 
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/wd-blue-sn570-review
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/wd-black-sn770-ssd-review
For 1 TB we get:
wd-black-sn770-ssd-review
Code: 
Product			250GB	500GB	1TB
Random Read		240,000 IOPS	460,000 IOPS	740,000 IOPS
Random Write	470,000 IOPS	800,000 IOPS	800,000 IOPS

wd-blue-sn570-review
Code: 
Random Read		190,000 IOPS	360,000 IOPS	460,000 IOPS
Random Write	210,000 IOPS	390,000 IOPS	450,000 IOPS

So interms IOPS sn770 should be twice as good as sn570!!!

Now my best guess, and I never had Cuda, is that the Internal SLC cache is causing the problem. This is good for watching Movies but not for RBT Search.

For a Test lets disable it in Windows. To be sure reboot and double check that it is still disabled. Then try again RBT Search in both. I will expect that both will improve. And that you will have no more problems.

Here we go I even did a search for you. Read how to disable in.
Code: 
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-server/backup-and-storage/turn-disk-write-caching-on-off

Let me show an example on how it improves. Read Only 1 rst post on
Code: 
https://hardforum.com/threads/disabling-write-caching-increased-write-speed-from-6mb-s-to-250mb-s-on-wd-nvme-ssd-with-exhausted-slc-cache.2022950/

The guy disables SLC and went from slow as 6MB/s to Immediately increased to 250MB/s in sustain random write.

I hope this is the problem. I have no other explanation.

So @dvlajkovic you should try too and lets us know if disabling SLC improve for you too and get lower your (128 sec.) & (103 sec.)
 
Last edited:
C

cayoenrique

Member
Messages
475
@dvlajkovic & @SatEze
I see SatEze read and post like. Good But PLEASE report your results once you disable Disk cache. I just want to kow if it in fact is a good solution.

Now for those Windows users.
Windows as well of Browsers and many other programs place Search/Indexrs runing in the background. Yes the Inspect anything you hook and have memory!! Spy on you.

Now forget the paranoid. If you believe me, then you know You are competing in the use of your HDD and SDD. So every program running subtract your final speed. You most stop all programs. In fact when I did GPGPU on windows I did have a special program that will STOP many Windows official background apps.
 
S

SatEze

Donating Member
Messages
277
Thank you to @dvlajkovic and @cayoenrique for your great suggestions. I finally found out what the problem was. The "AcronisTrueImage" tool was preventing the CSA-Rainbow tool from accessing the RBT table when both reside on the operating system drive, in this case C:\ Uninstalling AcronisTrueimage fixed the problem. See results below:Crypt8: 30 9F 65 95 A3 A8 60 A1

Crypt8: 30 9F 65 95 A3 A8 60 A1

Version 1.23 (Nov, 7th 2014)

CUDA Driver Version: 12.20 - Runtime Version: 6.50
Number of CUDA Devices: 1
Device 0: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (-28 Cores)
Search CW Start
RBT file: C:\Users\CSA-TesT\Downloads\B8hxFFh_tables_Ver1\CSA_B8hxFFh_10000h.rbt
Calc all 10000h end values for this crypt ... (using file cache)
Search end values in RBT ...
Searching CW in RBT ...
Found 292587 possible chains (harddisk only search time = 55 sec.)
Analysing chains ... (will be 10 times slower if an other thread is keeping the GPU busy)
found CW: 74 XX XX XX XX XX XX 11
Search CW done (71 sec.)
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top