what's the difference between ferrari card and sim 2.01
- Thread starter mightyusa
- Start date
In this field the cards not important
dreambox without support will be similar to any other cheap receiver
dreambox is developing machine by its softwares and peoples buy it because this
always look for support which is better inclduing new images,ssl,drivers and others
also be careful not to be deceived by what said as example look for drivers truly patched or mixed with very old files
dreambox without support will be similar to any other cheap receiver
dreambox is developing machine by its softwares and peoples buy it because this
always look for support which is better inclduing new images,ssl,drivers and others
also be careful not to be deceived by what said as example look for drivers truly patched or mixed with very old files
see here it will give you an idea witch one is better
http://www.sat-universe.com/forumdisplay.php?f=375
http://www.sat-universe.com/forumdisplay.php?f=375
look for patched drivers 2-9-2011 released by ferrari
http://www.sat-universe.com/showpost.php?p=825261&postcount=1
and compare the most important driver file in the package bcm7401.ko(this file usually protected by dream multimedia) and compare it with the one from original drivers 2010-12-15(15-12-2010)
http://www.sat-universe.com/showpost.php?p=718498&postcount=66
following graph demonstrate the comparison by winmerge prorgam and showed both are identical,that,s mean that the original bcm7401.ko file in original 2-9-2011 drivers replaced by bcm7401.ko from original drivers of 15-12-2011
by this you can say that patched 2-9-2011 drivers are same as old original drivers 15-12-2010,this is the worst type of false patching and in fact it is just deception of users
using old bcm7401.ko should be followed by using old usr/bin/enigm2 file
instead the original enigma2 file in new image(else the image will not work)
A
http://www.sat-universe.com/showpost.php?p=825261&postcount=1
and compare the most important driver file in the package bcm7401.ko(this file usually protected by dream multimedia) and compare it with the one from original drivers 2010-12-15(15-12-2010)
http://www.sat-universe.com/showpost.php?p=718498&postcount=66
following graph demonstrate the comparison by winmerge prorgam and showed both are identical,that,s mean that the original bcm7401.ko file in original 2-9-2011 drivers replaced by bcm7401.ko from original drivers of 15-12-2011
by this you can say that patched 2-9-2011 drivers are same as old original drivers 15-12-2010,this is the worst type of false patching and in fact it is just deception of users
using old bcm7401.ko should be followed by using old usr/bin/enigm2 file
instead the original enigma2 file in new image(else the image will not work)
A
Last edited:
Damn mfaraj57, you're the man!
In another thread (deleted by the admins), I was told by Toysoft that they've have patched the latest 02-09-2011 themselfs.
I guess he was bluffin lol.
They were probably like: what should we do? use the 02-09-2011 modules patched by sim2? or use the ones from 15-12-2011 and label them 02-09-2011?
They've gone with the latter
In another thread (deleted by the admins), I was told by Toysoft that they've have patched the latest 02-09-2011 themselfs.
I guess he was bluffin lol.
They were probably like: what should we do? use the 02-09-2011 modules patched by sim2? or use the ones from 15-12-2011 and label them 02-09-2011?
They've gone with the latter
i do not have problems with this image
ramimaher used true patched drivers in this image
but behavior of image is different with different users according to different hardware they have
fortunately user have many good alternatives in case if one image is defective