OPENSAT is slow but it is stable and it also works with the OS-emu softcam if @hapeba sectional oscam commits a new version would be great.
1) Yes, streaming to PC work good;
2) Bilndscan depends of model of Azbox, and work on models which support blindscan
3) 4:2:2 coloour (sub)sampling works but only MPEG2 not MPEG4(same as OFFW)
My opinion: Opensat FW is more stable, quality picture on HD channels, but E2 has more opportunities to "play" with box(skins,plugins,picons,softccams
realfoxx, thank you for response. You wrote that Opensat FW is more stable. What problems are in E2 images? What E2 image do you recommend?